Trump’s friends (and my friends) in the national intelligence community will not disappoint. They’ve done the forensics of ‘the steal.’ It was anticipated and extraordinary encrypted blockchain technology was utilized to document the steal where voting was done electronically. The strategy is in motion to deprive Biden of the 270 electoral votes by preempting Georgia and Pennsylvania from casting their elector votes in the Electoral College vote in mid-December. With neither candidate reaching the 270 elector vote threshold, the Constitution’s secondary mechanism would be brought into play forcing a Congressional election in January. Under the terms of a Congressional election, the Republicans would control twenty-six of the fifty state delegations, and would hand Trump a second term presidency amid this criminal conspiracy to steal the vote.
The American Thinker reports: “[T]he declaration of Navid Keshavarz-Nia, an expert witness who stated under oath that there was massive computer fraud in the 2020 election, all of it intended to secure a victory for Joe Biden. Dr. Kershavarz-Nia’s name may not mean a lot to you, but it’s one of the weightiest names in the world when it comes to sniffing out cyber-security problems.”
“We know how important Dr. Kershavarz-Nia is because, just two and a half months ago, the New York Times ran one of its Sunday long-form articles about a massive, multi-million-dollar fraud that a talented grifter ran against the American intelligence and military communities. Dr. Kershavarz-Nia is one of the few people who comes off looking good:
Navid Keshavarz-Nia, those who worked with him said, ‘was always the smartest person in the room.’ In doing cybersecurity and technical counterintelligence work for the C.I.A., N.S.A. and F.B.I., he had spent decades connecting top-secret dots. After several months of working with Mr. Courtney, he began connecting those dots too. He did not like where they led.
“Not only does Dr. Kershavarz-Nia have an innate intelligence, but he’s also got extraordinary academic and practical skills in cyber-fraud detection and analysis. The reason we know about his qualifications is that it takes seven paragraphs for him to list them in the declaration he signed to support the Georgia complaint.”
What do we know of this expert witness? His profile at CyberSummit USA states: ” Dr. Keshavarz-Nia is a vice president and senior director in INFOSEC with 30 years of experience in national security spanning leadership and program execution supporting the civilian, Defense, US Intelligence Agency (USIA), and commercial banking organizations. His background extends to cybersecurity engineering, technical counterintelligence, and incident response management. He is an innovator and has implemented next-generation security solutions across the IC, defense, and civilian clients. He has engineered technical solutions and managed large development teams involving security risk assessment, insider threat, incident response, and threat hunting exercises to identify advanced persistent threats. He is an experienced ethical hacker, big data architect, and cloud security expert in cloud computing, Blockchain technology, and big data analytic solutions. He has led or supported the CIA, NSA, DHS US-CERT, USCYBERCOM, and the FBI.”
So what does the brilliant man have to say? Among other things:
So what does the brilliant Dr. Kershavarz-Nia have to say? First and foremost “Hammer and Scorecard is real, not a hoax (as Democrats allege), and both are used to manipulate election outcomes. . .” Second “Dominion, ES&S, Scytl, and Smartmatic are all vulnerable to fraud and vote manipulation — and the mainstream media reported on these vulnerabilities in the past” and third “Dominion has been used in other countries to ‘forge election results.'” Dominion has taken steps to hide its ties to Venezuela, China, and Cuba. “Dominion machines are easily hackable. Dominion memory cards with cryptographic key access to the systems were stolen in 2019.”
Dr. Kershavarz-Nia posits that “The counts in the disputed states (Pennsylvania, Wisconsin, Michigan, Arizona, Nevada, and Georgia) show electronic manipulation. . . One to two percent of votes were forged in Biden’s favor. . . Optical scanners were set to accept unverified, un-validated ballots. . . The scanners failed to keep records for audits, an outcome that must have been deliberately programmed. . . The stolen cryptographic key [taken in 2019,] which applied to all voting systems, was used to alter vote counts. . . The favorable votes pouring in after-hours for Biden could not be accounted for by a Democrat preference for mailed-in ballots. Rather they demonstrated manipulation. It was impossible to feed 400,000 ballots into the machines within 2–3 hours. As New York Post reports, the media cover Biden the way a protection racket does. . . There was a Hammer and Scorecard cyber-attack that altered votes in the battleground states, and then forwarded the results to Scytl servers in Frankfurt, Germany, to avoid detection.
Dr. Keshavarz-Nia concluded with “high confidence that the election 2020 data were altered in all battleground states resulting in hundreds of thousands of votes that were cast for President Trump and transferred to Vice President Biden.”